🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a growing chorus of states are considering parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that phones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to approve a bill raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised families to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s without parental consent is given. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a useful foundation," commented the MEP behind the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by robust research".

Last year, interest grew behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering dangerous platform posts argues that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are safe and fit for children," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, regulation is largely occurring at the local level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule capping teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with any further time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures mandating guardian approval for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various individuals to mimic the Australian path, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, other countries are also exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, world bodies strike a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The agency notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide discussion continues, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that states around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.